Skip Nav

The Rogerian Proposal Essay Outline

Essay Structure for a Rogerian Argument

❶Concluding Your Rogerian Essay The conclusion in a Rogerian argument essay structure should illustrate why your position in this argument would be beneficial and would resolve the problem.

Post navigation

Is this question part of your Assignment?
We Proudly Support These Educational Associations
How Do You Write a Rogerian Argument Essay?

Explain why your thesis is valid. The research you have done in support of your position should appear here. While stating your thesis can be done in one paragraph, supporting the thesis will probably need several paragraphs. This section builds support for your point of view and illustrates that you have delved deeply into your subject and found material to endorse the position you have chosen. The conclusion in a Rogerian argument essay structure should illustrate why your position in this argument would be beneficial and would resolve the problem.

In other words, even though you have admitted that the other side of the argument has merit, you want to conclude by showing why your thesis is the better option.

If your position cannot completely solve the problem, as is often the case when writing about a controversial issue, admit that. State that while your ideas will help, more work needs to be done. Glenn, Cheryl, et al. The Writer's Harbrace Handbook. Definition of a Rogerian Argument To understand the Rogerian argument essay structure, you need to understand what defines this type of argument. When to Use This Type of Argument A Rogerian argument works best when the essay subject is one where people have strong, opposing positions.

How the Rogerian Structure Is Different The structure of a Rogerian argument is different than that of a classical argument because the opinions of the opposition are presented earlier in the essay and given due consideration. I understand that working with special needs students may seem like a challenge, and it is, but the rewards for both you and the students would be great. With nearly 25 students, the class would more than satisfy your volunteer quotas and Ms. Evans and myself will also attend to delegate duties and assist with supervision.

But most importantly, the students would be learning a valuable lesson about the operation of this enormous event. They would all have a deeper appreciation for the books sale, understanding all of the work that goes into making these little miracles happen at George Washington. I will be available from 9 am-6 pm, Monday through Thursday, if you would like to discuss the potential for a partnership between the fifth graders and the PTA.

I hope that we can establish a bond that will last for many years to come. In this introduction, we gain an understanding of the problem at hand. The identities of the speaker and audience are revealed. A teacher at an elementary school is discussing a volunteer shortage with the PTA.

The teacher compliments the PTA and acknowledges an existing relationship, thereby building a bridge. Here we get into the meat of the argument. The teacher wants the PTA to accept a responsibility and form a partnership with a student group. In the conclusion of this Rogerian argument example, we see the teacher acknowledge the potential difficulties of working with special needs students while also highlighting this class' experience.

The teacher asks the PTA to look past the challenges to see the possible benefits for this event and the kids. Concessions made include the offer of adult assistance and flexible contact hours. Outline the fourth stage. Here you restate your own position and examine it more fully in relation to the opposing position. This stage must give honest recognition of the other party's strong arguments and must also address those elements the two positions have in common.

When a reasonable compare and contrast has been done, conceding weaknesses on your side and finding mutual areas of shared interest, you are ready for the final stages of the essay. Present a possible starting point for discussion, based on shared goals and interests, with a clear statement of areas left to be explored and discussed. This is the point at which you reach the goal of the essay: To achieve this stage successfully, the reader should have at all stages a sense of honesty, honor and open-mindedness on your part, as well as a belief that there was a good-faith attempt at understanding the position of others.

The conclusion is not an argument intended to win a conflict but to win trust and an open exchange of ideas. It should reprise the nature of the subject, give another brief and respectful review of both sides, as well as offer a slightly longer review of shared positions and the benefit of open, good-faith dialogue. It should end on a positive note of hope. Test the connections between the stages and the flow of the discussion, and give special attention to fair evaluation and generous good will toward the opposing side.

Remember, in a Rogerian essay, you can't "win" by beating your opponent, but only by convincing your opponent to work with you with an open mind, in shared respect. Write the actual essay working from your staged notes. When you complete the essay, prepare second and third drafts to double- and triple-check your treatment of the opposing side and the nature of shared positions and mutual benefits. The tone of the writing must avoid patronization, disrespect or an assumption of foreknowledge that the opponent will eventually accept your stance in full.

The emotional burden of the writing need not be neutral -- and would often be seen as dishonest if it were neutral -- but it must be well-informed, fair-minded and obviously written in a good-faith attempt to understand and consider an "alien" point of view.

Be sure to have the final drafts read by others.


Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Follow this outline and example to form a Rogerian argument essay. Rogerian arguments are named for the psychologist who developed the technique, Carl Rogers. Rogers' research on human socialization suggested that traditional debate format, Aristotelian, was doomed to cause more conflict than it solved. With Roger's format, you can persuade an audience without agreeing to terms you cannot meet.

Privacy FAQs

Rogerian Argument canlimacizlemek.tk writing your outline for your Rogerian argument essay, you first have to familiarize yourself with the pros and cons or the two possible sides of your canlimacizlemek.tk is, get to know which side of the argument you are for and which side of the argument may be against your position.

About Our Ads

The Rogerian essay is named for the type of argument it makes–the Rogerian argument named after psychologist Carl Rogers. He believed that the key to effective communication lies in each side’s ability to negotiate differences in order to better understand each other. How to Write a Rogerian Essay: Quick Tips to Keep in Mind. Don’t Be. A Rogerian essay is meant to help students understand issues from two different perspectives to come up with an agreeable solution. According to Carl Roger's effort in. How To Write A Rogerian Essay. March 31, by admin Basic Essay Writing Tips. Rogerian argument is more of a negotiation method whereby shared goals are identified.

Cookie Info

A successful Rogerian argument essay structure spends time discussing opposing positions. This is what sets the Rogerian essay apart from other types of papers. Writing such an essay requires being able to see both sides of an issue while still asserting a specific viewpoint regarding your subject matter. Rogerian Method of Argumentation Use this outline if you are looking at two sides of an issue and want to reach a compromise with the point of view that is opposite yours.