It is simply not fair to impose this upon another person. In any case, pubs and restaurants could adapt to a ban by, for example, allowing smoking areas.
In conclusion, it is clear that it should be made illegal to smoke in public places. This would improve the health of thousands of people, and that is most definitely a positive development. The introduction is clear - note how it follows the ban smoking in public places essay question - it paraphrases the information in order to introduce the topic and the argument.
The argument against a ban on smoking in public places is presented first. It is made clear that it is not the authors opinion by the topic sentence: The writer then clearly shows they are moving on to the other argument which is their own and it has clearly been stated in the thesis that this is their argument: They are from the Academic and General Test.
You can also post t…. Hello, It's been a long time. I noticed I wasn't good enough and I spent several weeks to enhance my writing. Please judge my latest one. Free online lessons, strategies and tips to help you understand the IELTS reading module and achieve a high score.
One of these factors is the laws and regulations that govern any country. The writer needs to read extensively relevant materials that explain what the law of the land is regarding smoking.
Some countries allow smokers and nonsmokers to mix without any problem, regardless of whether one is smoking in congested areas or not. In such countries, smokers are expected make ethical decisions and think about the effect of their smoke on the people who do not smoke. Another point the argumentative essay should explain is whether there is any law that forbids smokers from using cigarettes in public.
In such countries, the law explains where smoking zones are located, if any, and the punishment that smokers should face if they break the law by smoking in non-smoking zones. In any argumentative essay, the writer should be able to show the contradicting views of people. For instance, in the argumentative essay on smoking in public places, the writer should explain what the consequences are for not setting up smoking zones.
The reason is that some people may argue that smoking in public places has no negative effects that warrant its ban, while others may argue out that smoking in public places is so bad and dangerous that governments should ban it completely in towns.
The writer should not present just the legislation, or desired future legislation. This does not get to the root of the argument, it rather illustrates that there is an argument. What are needed are the clear roots of the argument to be exposed and debated. This shows that a ban on smoking in all public places might be popular but a complete ban would be unpopular. This indicates that a larger proportion of the population does not like smoking; indeed, one of the smokers did not like smoking.
Overall, these results indicate that a partial on smoking would be more popular than a complete one. The results also indicate that the majority of people do not like smoking; I consider this to be a good thing for society. People have the right to do as they please so long as they do not break the law. By that reasoning people should be allowed to smoke in public. This is a fair argument so long as there is no law against smoking.
My questionnaire indicates that many people think that there should be a partial ban on smoking. This therefore nullifies the libertarian argument as it is debatable whether people should have the right to smoke. Against this, however, some would argue that banning smoking would be a detraction from people's rights and therefore morally wrong.
Thus we should not ban smoking in public places. Also, if other people don't like smoking, they should leave the vicinity of the smoker; it is the individual's choice whether or not they smoke, therefore it should also be the individual's choice whether or not to leave.
However this begs the question, why should the person doing the damage have priority? Smoking generates large amounts of money through taxation, admittedly smoking cost the National Health Service, yet the NHS is not a business run for profit. The purpose of the NHS is to keep the nation healthy, not to intrude upon the rights of the individual. There can be no argument against the NHS persuading people not to smoke, yet it is still the right of the individual to decide whether or not they wish to smoke.
Some groups argue that there is no definitive proof that smoking causes cancer. This is strictly true. However this begs the question, is it worth the risk just because the proof is not concrete? This argument is, to some extent, nullified by epidemiological research.
Ban Smoking in Public Places Essay This is a ban smoking in public places essay. It is an example of an essay where you have to give your .
Free smoking ban papers, essays, and research papers.
SHOULD CIGARETTE SMOKING BE BANNED? Essay sample by my essay writing com. Introduction. Cigarette, a long cylindrical roll of tobacco has been smoked by men for centuries. However, due to the fact that it has been the cause of several debilitating diseases, there have long been calls for it to be banned. Smoking essay is another tool to tell people about the negative effects of the habit. Still need ideas on creating an argumentative essay on banning tobacco? Feel free to check samples of such essays or watch talk shows.
Ban Smoking In Public Places Essay. Banning smoking in public places Before people start smoking they have a choice, but once you are a smoker that choice goes and you then become an addict. Smoking is the inhalation and exhalation of . Keywords: smoking ban essay, public smoking essay The numbers of people who smoke have increase over the years. Although they are equipped with the knowledge of how unhealthy smoking can be, people still choose to smoke.