Accordingly, Singer gives a highly idealistic and utopian theory and when we evaluate both pros and cons, it becomes obvious that the obstacles outweigh the advantages. His approach in curing world poverty is not only too extreme, but brings about cyclical and unsolvable issues.
It is important to consider and apply this method to real life and then reflect upon all the possible consequences. A different approach, or rather first step, to solving world poverty can be keeping to a minimum expensive worldwide projects. For example, millions of dollars are spent on the opening and closing ceremonies of the Olympics, World Soccer Cups, etc.
If instead the total money dedicated to these celebrations were to be saved and donated to the needy every few years, progress would certainly be a result.
Moreover, the ceremonies can be replaced with simple, yet entertaining concerts performed by artists willing to volunteer and help fund-raise money for the poor. This is just a sample. To get a unique essay Hire Writer. A limited time offer! Get custom essay sample written according to your requirements Urgent 3h delivery guaranteed Order Now. How to Write a Critical Analysis. As stated in the second paragraph, he seems to be persuading the audience to donate money to charity.
Is he trying to end the world poverty? Or merely raise funds for charity organisations? The two things can be really different. No one is forbidden to think that the simplest way to end poverty is to redistribute funds through charity. This pushes one into thinking that effective efforts on combating poverty should direct funds towards projects like infrastructure improvement, sounder governance policies, and so on.
Charity means giving bread to the poor all the time without teaching them how to make bread. It might be wiser to call on professionals having important skills to sacrifice a year or two of their professional careers in order to go to another nation and share their knowledge with people there. For instance, a manager of the food processing factory would do better to go and help start a factory somewhere in Africa rather than keep sending them the greater part of his salary in those years.
Singer, on the contrary, seems to see donations as the only viable means to end poverty. He does not take into account the efforts of people who work in development projects, and they may be contributing more to improving life quality of people in developing nations than they would if they stripped their life of TVs and new cars. With his example involving Bob and his car Singer alienates the audience rather than entices it into donating. If Bugatti is his own investment, then his whole future depends upon it.
His car is his only investment, his way to secure income after retirement. If he loses his car, he will have to live on Social Security benefits that are far from secure now with the reform looming and all the talk of the future depletion of funds, and if he can count on them, they can really be too small to pay even for necessities.
The US is a rich nation, but the whole social setup encourages Americans to care for themselves on their own, including insurance schemes and retirement savings. For this reason, Bob may have not to give up luxuries — he deprives himself of necessities to save the child. The picture of an old man losing his retirement funds and favourite car is far too gloomy to allure those who are eager to share a portion of their pie with starving children.
Singer could have made his demands on fellow citizens more realistic and less frightening if he had chosen an example more suitable to his thesis — keeping necessities but letting luxuries go in order to provide necessities to others.
The car may be his only hobby, the pursuit in which he engages with great zest. Museums and trips are definitely not on the list of necessities, and neither are CDs, books and computers that could store this information. Singer would have a hard time trying to implement his solution in reality since it feels like elimination of luxuries has the potential to stop all the cultural progress in world and, even more importantly, deny people the right to enjoy something other than simple meals.
Implementation of the solution would force one to produce an exact definition of what is luxury and what is not, and this is not as easy as it seems. Imagining that the targets are middle-class Americans, Singer is hardly ready to force them into paying for charity with these examples and his relentless claim to give up all beyond necessities.
Intuitively, he would score higher with pictures of how charity actually works and how children are saved with the donations. This is exactly what his paper is missing. And what exactly are the uncertainties? The first thing that comes to mind is corruption that is so prevalent in developing nations. Does Singer expect hard-working citizens to reduce themselves to a life consisting of bare necessities in order to feed immoral officials somewhere in Africa or Asia whose children are well off enough to pay their tuition at US universities?
This is an important objection, and Singer skips it by implying:
A Critique For “The Singer Solution To World Poverty”. In the essay “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” philosopher Peter Singer addresses. the issue of poverty by suggesting Americans give away most of their income to aid those in need.
Sep 05, · the singer solution to world poverty**Essay by Peter Singer, Australian philosopher, offers his unconventional thoughts about ordinary American's obligations to world's poor and suggests that even.
The Solution to World Poverty* PETER SINGER *From "The Singer Solution to World Poverty." The New York Times Magazine (). Using a number of examples to make his case, Peter Singer argues that whatever money. The essay "The Singer Solution to World Poverty", written by Peter Singer, states that the only solution to solve world poverty is for Americans to donate all the money they have that is not needed for necessities to aid organizations overseas. Singers article was published on September 5, in /5(2).
“The Singer Solution to World Poverty” World poverty has existed for many centuries and still exists today, gradually expanding and intensifying. This is the topic that Pete Singer, a professor of bioethics, calls attention to in his article “ The Singer Solution to World Poverty. In the New York Times Article “ the Singer Solution to World Poverty” the author Peter Singer argues that there is no reason why Americans don’t donate money to the needy when they can afford countless of luxury that are .